Mexico confirms ONLY 7 deaths due to ’swine’ flu which is really the bird flu *

Wise Up Journal
29.04.2009
By Gabriel O’Hara

You’ve heard the World Health Organisation and the media screaming about thousands of “suspected”, “probable”, “maybe” cases of “swine” flu and a whole lot of deaths numbers that might maybe be the “swine” flu. They also throw in how this or that flu killed so many million in the past and how our over populated world (in their opinion) is due a culling.  Sure makes you forget about the banks sucking nations dry and other problems. Ignore the hype and focus on the facts, there has only been 7 confirmed deaths in Mexico.

RTE
29.04.2009

The Mexican Health Minister said 159 people are now believed to have died from the virus out of 2,500 suspected cases.

However amid confusion, Jose Angel Cordova told a news conference that only seven of the deaths had been confirmed

____________

AFP / Manila Bulletin
29.04.2009

Mexico revises confirmed flu death toll down to seven

MEXICO CITY (AFP) - Mexico on Tuesday revised downwards its confirmed death toll from a new strain of flu to seven from 20, Health Minister Jose Angel Cordova told reporters.

Under sharp questioning as to how such a discrepancy could have occurred, Cordova said — to some confusion — that 26 proven cases of swine flu had been detected, of which “seven corresponded beyond any doubt to deaths caused by the new virus.”

____________

Do you want to know why the avian bird flu vaccine coporation stocks are soaring on the “swine” flu sacre? Because the “swine” flu is the avian H1N1 flu. The same old bird flu that people have lost their fear of, the World Health Organisatin fear hype.

Reuters / Yahoo
29.04.2009

Israel has already rejected the name swine flu, and opted to call it “Mexico flu.” Jewish dietary laws forbid eating pork.

The Paris-based World Organisation for Animal Health also objected to the name, saying the virus contains avian and human components and no pig so far has been found ill with the disease.

____________

Speaking of the virus containing avian and human components lets look back to February when Baxter incorporated did something illegal and said oops:

The Canadian Press
27.02.2009

Baxter admits flu product contained live bird flu virus

The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live H5N1 avian flu viruses.

On Friday, the company’s director of global bioscience communications confirmed what scientists have suspected.

“It was live,” Christopher Bona said in an email.

People familiar with biosecurity rules are dismayed by evidence that human H3N2 and avian H5N1 viruses somehow co-mingled in the Orth-Donau facility. That is a dangerous practice that should not be allowed to happen, a number of experts insisted.

release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in dire consequences.

____________

Chicago Tribune
27.04.2009
By Bruce Japsen

Swine flu: Baxter seeks swine flu sample to begin work on vaccine

Baxter confirmed over the weekend that it is working with the World Health Organization on a potential vaccine to curb the deadly swine flu virus that is blamed for scores of deaths in Mexico and has emerged as a threat in the U.S.

Upon learning about the swine flu outbreak in Mexico, Baxter requested a virus sample from WHO to do laboratory testing for potentially developing an experimental vaccine,” company spokesman Christopher Bona told the Tribune.

Over the years, Baxter has worked with governments around the world to develop and produce vaccines to protect against infectious disease or potential threats from bioterrorism.

____________

What to be concerned about is the hype causing government acceptance of a World Health Organisation alert 6 (we are on alert 4 now). All nations under the WHO umbrella, the majority of the world, have almost identical procedures for a WHO alert 6. Parts of those laws are highlight below. It involves all of the population to be injected with an experimental vaccine. Under a WHO alert 6 the vaccine would be pushed on all of the population: children, pregnant women, sick and old. If a large percentage of the population dies from avian flu after receiving the experimental vaccines it would be near impossible to distinguish if the live virus vaccines (mixed with other ingredients) caused the deaths or if the actual virus caused the deaths. Any investigates into that will not be independent as past disasters have proven to be the case. If a WHO alert 6 is announced it might be wise to form a neighbourhood health protection group with anyone who values their family’s health.

A WHO alert 6, justified or not, will kick off the following [Note that you lose all legal rights you think you have in a government perceived “emergency”]:

Wise Up Journal - http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=736
02.01.2009
By Gabriel O’Hara

Health Act section 32 A and B below deals with the entire population not just the infected […]. It gives the Minister power to order the injection of the entire population (quote: “all adult persons” and “all children”) with a vaccine they believe might immunise against a pandemic “caused by a new influenza strain“. You are probably thinking how could they create a vaccine so fast, doesn’t it take years to prove it is safe? They are prepared to alter the entire population’s immune system and DNA with what would be officially an untested experimental vaccine, are you prepared for that? It’s the law now.

Health Act section 32:
“The Minister may by order declare that-”

“it is necessary, for the purpose of preventing the spread of a particular infectious disease, that all adult persons should submit themselves to a specified measure in relation to their protection or immunisation against such infectious disease”

“The Minister may by order declare that—”

“it is necessary, for the purpose of preventing the spread of a particular infectious disease, that all children should be submitted to a specified measure in relation to their protection or immunisation against that infectious disease”.

Section 38 contains a purposeful loophole to detain anyone. It legalizes the detention of, by force if necessary, people who are not identified as infected but are a “probable” source. The name of section 38 is “Detention and isolation of person who is probable source of infection” and it states the following, “force may, if necessary, be used for the purpose of carrying out any provision of this subsection.”

Part 2 of section 38 redefines the word person into patient: “(2) Where an order is made under this section in relation to a person (in this subsection referred to as the patient), the following provisions shall have effect[….]”. This makes it legal for the government imprison people known not to be infected and label them as patients.

Read the full article

End of Nations - EU Takeover and the Lisbon Treaty