CFR Insider and Former Senator Gary Hart Comments on his Threat to Iran that the U.S uses False Attacks *
Wise Up Journal
by Saoirse MacSimon
Towards the end of this video clip CFR insider and former Senator Gary Hart amazingly states that he wrote a letter “for the Iranian Government” (and later says also for Americans) threating Iran, “what our own government was trying to plan and that was to find a reason for bombing Iran”. Hart then revealed that the U.S would be willing to create a false flag incidents themselves,”be very careful about this administration creating a U.S.S. Maine incident or a Gulf of Tonkin incident that would justify bombing Iran,” the former Senator said.
Insider Gary Hart was also questioned earlier in that clip what he meant when he startlingly said during a CFR meeting that George W. Bush could use 9/11 to carry out the New World Order. He refused to answer that question but said, “ask George H. W. Bush.” Whatever their collective view of what that term means, the important aspect to remember from this video clip is what is admitted; that these people have a mindset that uses disasters to further their goals and even to create those disasters themselves.
“Unsolicited Advice to the Government of Iran
Presuming that you are not actually ignorant enough to desire war with the United States, you might be well advised to read the history of the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine in Havana harbor in 1898 and the history of the Gulf of Tonkin in 1964.
Having done so, you will surely recognize that Americans are reluctant to go to war unless attacked. Until Pearl Harbor, we were even reluctant to get involved in World War II. For historians of American wars the question is whether we provoke provocations.
Given the unilateral U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003, you are obviously thinking the rules have changed. Provocation is no longer required to take America to war. But even in this instance, we were led to believe that the mass murderer of American civilians, Osama bin Laden, was lurking, literally or figuratively, in the vicinity of Baghdad.
Given all this, you would probably be well advised to keep your forces, including clandestine forces, as far away from the Iraqi border as you can. You might even consider bringing in some neighbors to verify that you are not shipping arms next door. Tone down the rhetoric on Zionism. You’ve established your credentials with those in your world who thrive on that.
If it makes you feel powerful to hurl accusations at the American eagle, have at it. Sticks and stones, etc. But, for the next sixteen months or so, you should not only not take provocative actions, you should not seem to be doing so.
For the vast majority of Americans who seek no wider war, in the Middle East or elsewhere, don’t tempt fate. Don’t give a certain vice president we know the justification he is seeking to attack your country. That is unless you happen to like having bombs fall on your head.”
George H. W. Bush stated on camera that the New World Order is a global long-rang plan of the “promise and vision of the UN’s founders.” In the same sentence speaking of the New World Order he said, “When we are successful and we will be…” Who are these we? Well as one would expect with a global point of view it includes members of different nations such as Gordon Brown (who can’t seem to stop talking about it), other individuals who speak of it include some war criminals like Henry Kissinger. Gary Hart said 9/11 can be used to carry out the New World Order; why does it need 9/11? Some major changes since then to name a few are the global war on terror, global law changes as a result, and over a million people in Iraq have died. What ever it is that these unbalanced influential people believe in, it does not look promising; let’s hope they don’t bring their “promise and vision” in to full effect.
Whether H. G. Wells non-fiction book published (1940) in the same decade the UN was founded, which is titled “The New World Order” has anything to do with the visions of the UN’s founders on The New World Order could be up for debate, but lets see what it has to say:
“There may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires and from pukkha sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to estimate its promise we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
- The New World Order, by H. G. Wells
So it’s a long-range vision of a “beneficial” world system, but countless people including millionaires, pretty ladies, even “graceful-looking” people will hate it and will die (be killed?) “protesting against it”. For their beliefs and for “the betterment of mankind.” Are people like Bush and Kissinger capable of taking and giving orders for mass murder?